The Economics of the Public Interest and Economic Development in Iraq
The issue of the public interest is one of the most complex and intertwined in modern economic thought, representing the intersection of economics, politics, society, and even moral and religious values. With the publication of the book *The Economics of the Public Interest* by the French economist Jean Tirole, this concept was reintroduced in a new context that keeps pace with global transformations, particularly in light of the dominance of the market economy and the decline of the traditional role of the state. Through this theoretical framework, many of the challenges facing the Iraqi economy can be understood, as the dilemma of reconciling individual interests with the public good is clearly and significantly impacting the course of economic development.
The world has witnessed radical transformations in recent decades, including the collapse of planned economic systems, as seen with the fall of the Berlin Wall and China’s economic transformation, leading to the rise of the market economy as the dominant global model. This transformation was not merely a change in economic mechanisms, but rather a fundamental shift in the relationship between the state and the market. The influence of economic actors has increased at the expense of political power, and new tools such as privatization, globalization, and open competition have emerged, along with a reliance on independent regulatory bodies and central banks.
Despite this apparent “victory” of the market economy, it remained an incomplete triumph, failing to win the trust of the people or achieve social justice as desired. On the contrary, criticism mounted, arguing that this system sacrificed the public good for the sake of maximizing profits and private interests, leading to the disintegration of the social contract, widening class disparities, a decline in human values, and environmental crises that threaten the sustainability of economic growth.
In this context, fundamental questions arise: Has the world lost its way toward the common good? And how can economic policies be redirected to serve society as a whole? To answer these questions, Tyrol draws on a profound philosophical concept known as the “veil of ignorance,” developed by philosopher John Rawls. This concept is based on an individual’s imagined self before birth, without knowledge of their social or economic position, or even their personal characteristics. In this hypothetical situation, the individual is supposed to choose the most equitable social system, since they could potentially occupy any position within it.
This perspective is an effective tool for identifying the public interest because it compels individuals to think objectively, setting aside their personal biases. Through it, a relative consensus can be reached on the fundamental values upon which society should be based, such as justice, equal opportunities, social protection, and basic rights.
But the real challenge lies not only in defining the public interest, but also in how to achieve it in practice. This is where economics comes in, as an applied science that seeks to design policies and institutions that fulfill this objective. Individuals, by their very nature, respond to incentives, whether material or moral, and therefore their behavior may align with or conflict with the public interest, depending on the nature of these incentives.
From this perspective, achieving the common good requires building institutions capable of reconciling individual interests with collective goals. This means that the market economy is not an end in itself, but rather a tool that can be used to achieve development, provided it is organized in a way that ensures both fairness and efficiency.
Turning to the Iraqi case, these problems take on a more complex dimension. As a rentier state heavily reliant on oil revenues, Iraq suffers from structural imbalances in its economy, including a weak private sector, high unemployment rates, deteriorating infrastructure, and widespread administrative and financial corruption. These challenges hinder sustainable economic development and weaken the state’s ability to serve the public interest.
The absence of effective institutions regulating the relationship between the state and the market leads to conflicts of interest, where private interests prevail over the public good. For example, some individuals or companies may overexploit natural resources for quick profits, disregarding environmental or social impact, leading to the degradation of shared resources such as water and air.
This highlights the importance of the concept of “commons,” which refers to resources that should be accessible to everyone, such as the environment and cultural heritage. While these resources belong to everyone, they are vulnerable to depletion if their use is not effectively regulated. Therefore, setting appropriate prices for these resources or imposing restrictions on their use is a means of achieving both fairness and efficiency.
In Iraq, this concept can be implemented through strict environmental policies, regulating the use of natural resources, and activating the role of oversight institutions. Transparency and accountability in public finance management can also be enhanced to ensure that resources are directed towards projects that serve genuine development.
Furthermore, achieving the public good requires reforming the education system to guarantee equal opportunities and empower individuals to participate effectively in the economy. It also requires strengthening the healthcare system and providing social protection for the most vulnerable groups to ensure social justice.
On the other hand, the role of the state must be reconsidered, so that it is not merely a regulatory body, but an active partner in development, through investment in infrastructure, support for innovation, and encouragement of the private sector. In this context, successful international experiences that have achieved a balance between the market and the state can be drawn upon.
As Terol emphasizes, the economy does not serve a particular class, nor does it justify a specific economic system; rather, it seeks to improve the well-being of society as a whole. Therefore, the use of economic tools must be directed toward achieving the common good, not merely maximizing profits.
In conclusion, achieving economic development in Iraq requires adopting a comprehensive vision based on the concept of the public interest. This vision must be founded on building strong institutions, designing effective policies, and promoting social values that foster cooperation and solidarity. The challenge is not easy, but it is achievable if the political will, strategic vision, and active community participation are present.
The public interest is not merely a slogan; it is a true measure of the success of any economic system and the foundation upon which development policies must be built to ensure a better future for generations to come.
Akked Center for Economic and Financial Studies
Contact us via email
information@acefs.org
